What this plan covers
Reusable baseline for source-controlled selected engineered fill in defined zones, including receipt, layer placement, conditioning, compaction process, specified compliance tests, rework and survey/handover. Excludes bulk cut/fill balancing, ordinary utility trench bedding/surround/backfill, pavement-specific acceptance unless included, stabilisation and ground improvement.
Free editable proposed work-package baseline. Source material is topic guidance, not an adopted project standard or acceptance requirement. Complete against contract, drawings, specifications, geotechnical documents, approved procedures, adopted standards and assigned roles. All actual measurements, tests, dates, dispositions and signatures remain blank until work is performed.
Project-specific ITP drafting for this package
The plan can connect source approval and receiving-surface readiness to layer placement, conditioning, compaction evidence, lot testing, nonconformance / retest traceability and survey closeout. It does not invent compaction percentages, moisture windows, lot sizes or test rates.
Useful files to provide
- Approved fill zones, layer purposes and design levels
- Material source approval and geotechnical acceptance basis
- Project compaction method / trial and test-lot frequency requirements
- Rework, retest, survey and release responsibilities
Example of an input still needed
For example: “The fill specification is referenced but not attached, and no test-lot frequency is stated. Please provide the adopted clause or confirm who will issue that requirement.”
A project-specific fill placement and compaction ITP service prepares the plan and matching blank site records for this package. The listed inputs help scope the work; if an item is unavailable, it can be recorded as an open project decision rather than guessed.
How the plan and blank records fit together
The Excel, Word and PDF downloads each contain the plan and corresponding blank record forms. For this package, entries such as Layer / lot ID, Approved source ID, Test / method / date provide examples of location, source / product and observation or traceability fields. They are fields in the downloadable package files, not separate online records; the browser editor edits the plan only.
Define the package before tailoring it
- Work zones and boundaries
- Identify drawing references, start/end locations, interfaces and exclusions.
- Design and ground basis
- Identify approved drawings, geotechnical documents, controlled specifications and disposition roles.
- Material source and intended use
- Identify material designation, source, permitted use and required project approval evidence.
- Inspection, lotting and testing basis
- Copy the actual project method, acceptance source, lot basis, rate, location and reporting requirement.
- Roles and external control
- Identify performer/reviewer roles and actual contractual notice, H/W and release provisions.
- Survey / closeout evidence
- Identify datum, drawing criteria, survey responsibility and handover records.
Inspection sequence and project requirements
This starting plan contains 9 inspection steps. Proposed timing and roles need project confirmation; no contractual hold point or engineering acceptance value is assigned by this template. Actual results and signatures remain blank.
SEF-01 · Engineered fill scope and acceptance basis
- Work stage
- Engineered fill scope and acceptance basis
- Inspection / test
- Define each selected engineered fill zone, intended function, design elevation, required material class and acceptance evidence.
- Method
- Review approved drawings, geotechnical/design documents, earthworks specification and test/lot plan; record the governing revision and unresolved decisions.
- Acceptance condition
- Zone boundaries, use, required material, placement method, acceptance criteria, lotting and responsibility are stated in controlled project documents; no value is inferred. [Fill: Approved civil / services drawings and revisions] [Fill: Geotechnical design basis and disposition roles] [Fill: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards] [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan]
- Timing / coverage
- Before sourcing, placement or changes to zone/design basis.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Selected fill zone and criteria register
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Approved civil / services drawings and revisions; Geotechnical design basis and disposition roles; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Approved civil / services drawings and revisions; Geotechnical design basis and disposition roles; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements
- Blank record fields
- Zone / layer purpose; Design / geotechnical ref.; Material / acceptance source locator; Lot / test plan ref.
SEF-02 · Fill source and material approval
- Work stage
- Fill source and material approval
- Inspection / test
- Verify source identity and project evidence for each selected engineered fill material before delivery/use.
- Method
- Compare source proposal, representative material identification and required test/certification reports with project material schedule and nominated approval route.
- Acceptance condition
- Source, material type and intended zone match the approved project record; required evidence is complete and current for the material/source presented. [Fill: Material source, classification and use schedule] [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan] [Fill: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards]
- Timing / coverage
- Before first use of each source/material and when source or material changes.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Engineered fill source approval register
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Material source, classification and use schedule; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Material source, classification and use schedule; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements
- Blank record fields
- Quarry / source / supplier; Material ID / description; Test / certificate ref.; Approved use zone
SEF-03 · Receiving formation readiness
- Work stage
- Receiving formation readiness
- Inspection / test
- Confirm the prepared receiving surface is identified and accepted for selected engineered fill placement.
- Method
- Inspect the surface, drainage and boundaries; compare set-out and documented geotechnical/design disposition; confirm required preceding records are available.
- Acceptance condition
- Receiving surface and any specified treatment/release match project drawings and written dispositions; unresolved water, soft areas or conflicts are referred before covering. [Fill: Approved civil / services drawings and revisions] [Fill: Geotechnical design basis and disposition roles] [Fill: Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements] [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles]
- Timing / coverage
- Before the first fill layer in each zone and after re-preparation.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Receiving formation inspection
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Approved civil / services drawings and revisions; Geotechnical design basis and disposition roles; Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Approved civil / services drawings and revisions; Geotechnical design basis and disposition roles; Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements
- Blank record fields
- Zone / area; Observed level / drawing locator; Surface / moisture / drainage observation; Disposition / release ref.
SEF-04 · Delivery identity and material traceability
- Work stage
- Delivery identity and material traceability
- Inspection / test
- Check each delivery or defined delivery group is linked to the approved source, material and intended zone.
- Method
- Review docket/load records and observe material identity/condition; reconcile source, material designation and destination with the approval register.
- Acceptance condition
- Delivery is identifiable and consistent with the accepted material for the intended zone; discrepancies are segregated pending project decision. [Fill: Material source, classification and use schedule] [Fill: Project records and handover requirements]
- Timing / coverage
- Each delivery or project-defined delivery group before placement.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Selected fill delivery register
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Material source, classification and use schedule; Project records and handover requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Material source, classification and use schedule; Project records and handover requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles
- Blank record fields
- Docket / load ID; Approved source ID; Material ID / description; Zone / layer reference
SEF-05 · Layer area, thickness and placement sequence
- Work stage
- Layer area, thickness and placement sequence
- Inspection / test
- Inspect the placed layer and record its area and thickness basis before conditioning/compaction.
- Method
- Observe spreading, segregation and layer boundaries; measure or obtain the project-required thickness evidence using the specified method.
- Acceptance condition
- Material is placed in the approved zone and sequence; layer dimensions and continuity meet the project-stated requirements and are recorded against the source criteria. [Fill: Approved civil / services drawings and revisions] [Fill: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards] [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan]
- Timing / coverage
- Each layer/zone and material change before compaction.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Engineered fill layer placement record
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Approved civil / services drawings and revisions; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Material source, classification and use schedule; Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Approved civil / services drawings and revisions; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Material source, classification and use schedule; Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles
- Blank record fields
- Layer ID / elevation; Area / lot boundary; Observed layer thickness / unit; Material / delivery references
SEF-06 · Moisture conditioning and compaction method
- Work stage
- Moisture conditioning and compaction method
- Inspection / test
- Verify the approved conditioning and compaction method is being followed for the identified material and layer.
- Method
- Observe conditioning and plant/method; compare with approved procedure or project trial where required; log actual observations only where specified.
- Acceptance condition
- Method and any moisture/plant constraints follow the approved project procedure; no target moisture, equipment, pass count or density is assumed by this baseline. [Fill: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards] [Fill: Material source, classification and use schedule] [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan]
- Timing / coverage
- During each applicable layer and whenever material, weather or method changes.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Layer conditioning and compaction process log
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Material source, classification and use schedule; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Material source, classification and use schedule; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles
- Blank record fields
- Layer / lot ID; Plant / method reference; Observed conditioning / actual reading if required; Approved method / trial ref.
SEF-07 · Compaction operation and layer completion
- Work stage
- Compaction operation and layer completion
- Inspection / test
- Inspect the controlled compaction process and identify completed layer boundaries for testing or next-stage work.
- Method
- Observe the approved operation across the identified area; map completed and reworked portions to the lot/layer plan without substituting visual observation for specified testing.
- Acceptance condition
- The specified method covers the recorded area and layer; any omitted, disturbed or visibly deficient area is corrected and identified for required verification before concealment. [Fill: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards] [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan]
- Timing / coverage
- Per defined layer/lot during placement and before the next layer obscures it.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Compaction activity and layer map
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements
- Blank record fields
- Lot / boundary plan ref.; Layer ID / area; Method / plant reference; Rework area / instruction ref.
SEF-08 · Specified compliance tests and result disposition
- Work stage
- Specified compliance tests and result disposition
- Inspection / test
- Track project-required samples/tests by material, layer, lot, location, method and report; manage failures to written disposition.
- Method
- Check test request and report traceability against project test plan; compare reported results only with the cited project acceptance clause and identify retest/rework link.
- Acceptance condition
- Required tests and reports cover the defined lot under project criteria; results are assessed by the nominated method; failed or missing results remain open until documented disposition and verification. [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan] [Fill: Project earthworks specification and adopted standards] [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles]
- Timing / coverage
- At the project-defined lot/sample trigger and before dependent work; exact rate and method are project inputs.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Selected fill test and disposition register
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Project earthworks specification and adopted standards; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles; Project records and handover requirements
- Blank record fields
- Test / method / date; Lot / layer / location; Actual result / unit; Project clause / disposition / retest ref.
SEF-09 · Finished zone survey, protection and handover
- Work stage
- Finished zone survey, protection and handover
- Inspection / test
- Verify completed zone geometry, test dossier, protection condition and receiving-trade interface.
- Method
- Compare survey and test register with project closeout requirements; walk the zone for damage, drainage or disturbance after test/acceptance.
- Acceptance condition
- Specified geometry and records are submitted against current project criteria; damage or outstanding results are resolved or carried as a documented hold before handover. [Fill: Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements] [Fill: Project testing, lotting and reporting plan] [Fill: Project records and handover requirements]
- Timing / coverage
- At completion of each zone and immediately before handover or concealment.
- Responsible role
- Proposed: assigned earthworks supervisor / quality role performs and records; project-assigned reviewer acts only within documented authority. Confirm project roles: [Fill: Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles].
- Control / release arrangement
- Proposed internal readiness check. Confirm any contractual Hold/Witness point, notice, evidence and release authority from project documents; none is assigned by this baseline.
- Record
- Selected fill completion and handover index
- Project document reference
- Identify the exact project document, revision and clause/drawing item for: Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Project records and handover requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles. Include applicable annexures and written dispositions; record a precise missing-input prompt if the project source is unavailable. Topic sources do not establish project adoption.
- Project inputs to resolve
- Survey control, geometry and closeout requirements; Project testing, lotting and reporting plan; Project records and handover requirements; Performing, reviewing and contractual release roles
- Blank record fields
- Zone / design reference; As-built survey / revision; Test register / outstanding items; Receiving party / handover ref.
Source notes
- Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads, MRTS04 General Earthworks (March 2025)
Inspected topic example for Queensland road and bridge earthworks only. Supports identification of process topics, documentary controls, materials, geometry, excavation, fill, compaction, backfill and the fact that lot/test rules are specified. Its technical values, tests, frequencies, lot sizes, control points and roles are not defaults; use only if the project contract adopts this edition and applicable annexures.
Inspected official PDF and local searchable extract industry-library/text/tmr-mrts04.txt. Topic locators: 1.1-1.2 scope (printed specification pp. 1-2); 5.2-5.6 procedures, testing/lotting (printed pp. 15-19); 6 geometry (printed pp. 19-20); 8 topsoil (printed pp. 22-24); 9 unsuitable material (printed pp. 25-26); 13 excavation (printed pp. 34-38); 14 Earth Fill (printed pp. 38-47); 15 Compaction (printed pp. 48-53); 19 Backfill (printed pp. 67-74).
- Hutchinson Builders, Safety & Quality Planning: 010 Groundworks ITP and Report (EXAMPLE)
Builder example marked EXAMPLE; used only to check broad staging and useful lot/report fields. Many acceptance/frequency/role cells are blank. It does not set universal criteria, regulatory steps or release authority. Original DOCX files are not redistributed.
Official downloads page lists 010 Groundworks ITP and 010 Groundworks Report; both DOCX files downloaded and text-extracted 2026-10-07 from the linked Toolbox files. ITP table rows 3-11 cover bulk set-out, fill source, excavation, fill operations, bottom/surface preparation, compaction/soil-strength records and final inspection; rows 12-25 cover detailed earthworks, trench/pit bottoms, bedding/blinding, backfill, regulatory records and closeout. Matching report table rows 2-4 capture lot/location/open-close/comments/signature; rows 8-32 carry process, specification, acceptance, pass/fail, CAR, initials and date.
- Construction Quality Australia, How to create an Inspection and Test Plan
Method structure only: sequence checkable activities and specify method, acceptance source, trigger/frequency, responsibility, control and records. Does not substantiate earthworks technical limits or project requirements.
Official industry guide, sections 1-4, previously inspected and summarized in skills/au-construction-itp/references/template-writing-guide.md.
Connect the plan to field evidence
- Construction Nonconformance Report and Corrective Action Record
- Construction ITP Inspection and Quality Records Register
- Subgrade and formation inspection
- Compaction test and retest traceability
- Trench bedding and backfill inspection
How to write an ITP from project documents · Compare the broader earthworks & excavation scope
Need your fill placement and compaction ITP prepared for this project?
Send your drawings, specifications and contractor requirements. Receive a project-specific ITP and matching blank site records in Excel, Word and PDF.
USD 99 per defined work package · Within 24 hours after payment and the required project files are complete.