Scope of this guide
For Australian construction teams drafting or using an ITP. Definitions vary by contract and organisation. Confirm the project’s terms, parties, notice periods, release authority and any deemed-proceed rule in controlled documents before use.
The distinction is about the next action
In TfNSW G2, a Hold Point is a point beyond which the work process must not proceed without the Principal’s express written authorisation. Its Witness Point definition requires prior notice and gives the Principal the option to attend. These are useful examples, not universal definitions: other contracts can define control points differently.
| ITP control | Question the row must answer | What the record should show |
|---|---|---|
| Hold | May the next activity start only after a specified release? | Notice/readiness, evidence reviewed, named authorised release, date/time and released scope |
| Witness | Who receives an opportunity to attend, how is notice given and what happens if they do not attend? | Notice recipient, required notice period/source, attendance or non-attendance and inspection evidence |
| Review/document point | Must a document be submitted or accepted before an activity? | Document/revision, reviewer, response status and any linked hold condition |
Choose the control from the contract and risk
Start with explicit contract points and regulatory inspection requirements. Do not weaken a specified hold point by relabelling it as a witness point. If a control is not specified, propose the point to the responsible project authority for agreement rather than creating approval powers for a party that does not hold them.
For each proposed point, identify what will become inaccessible or materially harder to verify, what evidence is required before covering or proceeding, and who has authority to release the next step. A project may assign internal contractor checks separately from client or certifier points.
- Use H only when the project documents establish a stop and identify the release authority or approval route.
- Use W only after verifying the notice recipient, notice method and whether the contract permits work to proceed if the party does not attend.
- Keep surveillance, routine inspection and document review distinct where the project legend distinguishes them.
Make the point operable in the ITP
A usable control-point row names the exact work boundary, readiness condition, inspection or document evidence, notice recipient, notice lead time as stated in the contract, and the outcome that allows work to move on. Link it to the next activity so a supervisor can see the consequence.
Keep required approval separate from attendance. A person’s presence, silence, email receipt or inspection record is not automatically a release unless the contract says it is.
Plan the field record before issuing the row
The matching field record should let the team prove which location or lot was checked, which drawing/specification revision governed it, what was observed or tested, where supporting evidence is filed, and what happened to any discrepancy. A signature box cannot create delegated authority; use the role and approval route assigned by the project.
Fictional example: bathroom membrane before tile installation
Fictional teaching scenario only. A contractor’s approved project quality plan assigns the builder’s quality lead a hold point before tiling, while the contract gives the client representative a witness opportunity for the pre-cover inspection. No real project, legal rule, membrane value or inspection result is represented.
- Identify the room/zone and approved drawing and membrane-system documents in the row.
- The subcontractor submits a readiness notice and records the substrate, junction, penetration and membrane evidence required by the approved project documents.
- The contractor’s assigned quality lead reviews the evidence and records the hold release using the project’s approved process. Tiling remains stopped until that release.
- The client representative receives the contract-specified witness notice. Record attendance or non-attendance; apply the contract’s stated next step.
- File the completed record and any issue/reinspection reference against the same room/zone.
Before issuing the plan
- Check the contract’s own H/W legend before copying a definition from a public guide.
- For every H point, identify the actual release authority and what written release evidence counts.
- For every W point, identify notice timing, recipient, channel and contract rule for non-attendance.
- Link each point to a work stage that can be observed and a matching evidence record.
- Escalate ambiguous or conflicting control-point instructions before the concealed or irreversible work stage.
Sources and their limits
Public sources explain the planning topics below. Confirm their jurisdiction, contract context and applicable edition; use controlled project documents for the actual requirements.
- TfNSW G2 General Requirements for Major Contracts, clause 1.2.5
Clause 1.2.8, Other Definitions: Hold Point and Witness Point
Primary example of contract-specific meanings: a hold requires express written Principal authorisation before work proceeds; a witness point gives prior notice and an opportunity to attend. TfNSW contract language is not universal outside its contract.
Source reviewed: 2026-10-07
- TfNSW Guide to Quality Management System (Type 4), NQ4
Clause 8.1.2 Frequency of Testing and cross-reference to Q4 clauses 1.4 and 8.2.4.2
Public infrastructure example connecting ITP entries to specification requirements, testing frequency and review; frequency remains project/specification dependent.
Source reviewed: 2026-10-07
- TfNSW Quality Management (Major Works) – QA
Clause 3.8.2 Inspection and Test Plans, especially required stages/frequency, method and criteria, nominated H/W points and time constraints, performing/reviewing roles, nonconformance next steps and lot close-out
Contract-specific example that ITPs sit within project quality planning and carry steps, methods, records and criteria. Does not establish a universal building ITP format.
Source reviewed: 2026-10-07
- Construction Quality Australia: Guide – How to Create an Inspection and Test Plan (ITP)
Public industry guide on work scope, requirements, responsibilities and review
Industry context for planning and review workflow; used as guidance, not as a governing project specification or approval.
Source reviewed: 2026-10-07